Why People Give: The Psychology and Triggers Behind Charitable Donations

Understanding what drives someone to click that 'donate' button isn’t just a matter of curiosity—it's a strategic necessity. With giving behaviours evolving rapidly and donor expectations rising, charities need more than compelling campaigns. They need insights to understand the why behind generosity.

This article explores the donor psychology, triggers, and tools behind charitable donations, backed by research and practical advice that charities can act on. 

1. Core Motivations for Giving

Core Motivations for Giving refer to the fundamental emotional, psychological, and social reasons that drive people to support charitable causes. Understanding them is the first step toward designing campaigns and journeys that resonate. Next, we explore these in detail:

a) Empathy and Emotional Triggers 

Emotional storytelling is one of the strongest motivators for giving. 

The Journal of Neuroscience states that “presenting evaluable identifiable information can recruit positive arousal, which then promotes giving.” It suggests that when people see relatable stories or individuals, the emotional response can motivate them to give—even if it means making a personal sacrifice.

According to Paul Slovic, a professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, people respond more strongly to the story of an individual in need than to statistics about thousands. This phenomenon, called the "identifiable victim effect," is a preference for giving to single, vivid individuals over less identifiable others. It suggests that personalised stories of impact resonate more than abstract causes.

Moreover, research shows that how a story is told significantly influences emotional response—and, by extension, charitable donations. Stories that use personification have the strongest impact, particularly when accompanied by photographic images. In contrast, statistical or mobilising information produces only a mild effect. 

Facts Alone Don’t Inspire Giving

The traditional straight news format, though common in journalism, evokes the weakest emotional reaction. 

These findings highlight a key truth for charities: simply “reporting the news” isn’t enough. To inspire action, stories must help readers form an empathetic connection—especially when the suffering feels distant or large-scale.

b) Altruism: Giving Is in Our Nature

Research by Fehr and Fischbacher (2003) shows that even in anonymous, rewardless situations, many people choose to act generously. Their studies observed strangers in repeated monetary exchanges who, despite having no personal gain, displayed spontaneous altruistic behaviour. This suggests that helping others may not always be about recognition or obligation—it’s often a natural human instinct. 

c) Social Norms and Peer Influence

While altruism may be intrinsic, social influence plays a powerful role in shaping giving behaviour. People are more likely to donate when they see others doing the same—especially in visible or peer-led settings. 

Fehr and Fischbacher’s work also supports this, showing that charitable behaviour is influenced by observation and social cues. This is why peer-to-peer campaigns, donor walls, and live donation tickers work so well—they leverage the psychological power of social proof to encourage action.

d) Reciprocity and Gratitude 

According to Robert Cialdini in his book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, reciprocity is a powerful motivator. When donors are acknowledged, they feel a stronger bond with the cause and a desire to give again.

“With regard to efficacy, people are more likely to give if they feel that their input is important for the cause they are supporting – that they are making a difference. When individuals feel that their contributions are effective, they give more and give more often (Jackson and Matthews 1995; Parsons 2003).”

e) Personal Identity and Values Alignment

Giving often aligns with personal identity and core values. Research from The Science of Generosity initiative (University of Notre Dame) shows that people are more likely to give when the cause reflects their self-concept, values, or moral beliefs. Generosity is not just an act—it’s often an expression of who the donor is.

“People who help others through philanthropy and other helping behaviours are more likely to have altruistic, prosocial, postmaterialist, or caring values and those who feel personal and moral responsibility for the welfare of others (Bekkers and Wiepking 2007; Ray 1998). 

Further, people tend to give to charitable organisations that espouse values similar to their own (Bennett 2003).“  

2. Situational and Environmental Factors

Giving behaviour isn’t just about who we are—it’s also shaped by the context we’re in and the cues we encounter.

a) Timing and Seasonal Peaks 

Giving isn’t evenly spread throughout the year—it surges during certain months and key occasions. The Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) predicted an estimated £2.8 billion during November and December in donation last year, making the festive season the most generous time of the year.

The top reasons cited for giving during peak seasons include:

• Greater awareness of those in need (37%)
• Seeing it as a traditional time to give (28%)
• Increased visibility of charity appeals (23%)
• Choosing to donate instead of buying presents (10%)

Beyond the winter holidays, other periods like Ramadan also see dramatic increases in giving. British Muslims donate over £200 million during Ramadan alone, according to the Muslim Charities Forum.

b) Urgency and Scarcity 

Behavioural economics consistently shows that urgency and scarcity can strongly influence action. When people perceive a limited opportunity—whether it's time-sensitive, emotionally pressing, or financially matched—they are more likely to donate.

This is backed by findings in the CAF UK Giving Report 2025:

“Around 1 in 3 donors (31%) gave in response to a charity emergency appeal in the last 12 months, equivalent to 8.9 million people.

Younger donors (ages 16–24) and those in London were especially responsive to international appeals, while parents with children under 18 showed strong support for local campaigns. Additionally, people optimistic about their financial future were more likely to give to appeals, regardless of their actual income level.”

These insights suggest that both emotional urgency (e.g. disasters, humanitarian crises) and tactical urgency (e.g. campaign deadlines or matching offers) are effective levers in motivating donors to act.

c) Ease of Giving

Even strong motivation can falter when the giving experience is difficult.

As highlighted by the Fogg Behaviour Model, a behaviour (like donating) happens when three things align: Motivation, Ability, and a Prompt. While your campaign may spark motivation and send the right prompts, ability or ease can make or break the outcome. 

In practice, this means that if your donation process is clunky, slow, or confusing, even the most well-intentioned supporter may abandon their gift. For instance, having too many form fields in your donation checkout can result in abandonment.

3. Demographic and Psychographic Influences

Demographic and psychographic influences shape how different groups give, based on factors like age, income, values, and lifestyle preferences.

a) Age-Based Trends: One Size Doesn’t Fit All

Charitable motivations and behaviours vary sharply by generation, shaped by values, digital habits, and preferred giving methods. Insights from the CAF UK Giving Report show generational differences in giving:

• Gen Z (16–24) are cause-driven and socially influenced. Nearly half (49%) give because they care deeply about a cause, and 17% were prompted to donate by friends or family. They favour digital-first channels like fundraising apps (22%), crowdfunding (19%), and till round-ups. Religion and setting a positive example also play a stronger motivational role than for older donors.
  
  
• Millennials (25–44) value convenience, especially digital and recurring giving. Trends show Millennials respond well to user-friendly donation flows, peer fundraising, and social impact storytelling.
  
  
• Boomers (65+) are the most generous age group by total giving, contributing an estimated £4.5 billion in 2024. They prioritise trust (46%) and consistency, favouring direct debit (56%) and charity lotteries. Their giving is often automated, reflecting long-term commitment rather than spontaneity.

b) Faith and Cultural Influence

Religious observance is a powerful driver of charitable donations, with faith-based motivations shaping not just when people give, but also how and to whom. 

Among Muslim donors, giving peaks significantly during Ramadan. According to Blue State’s Muslims Giving Behaviour report, 62% of Muslims who pay Zakat do so during Ramadan, which is considered especially sacred. In recent years, UK donors gave over £130 million during Ramadan, underlining their critical role in annual donation cycles.

Cultural alignment also plays a role in trust and giving preference. The British Muslim Charitable Giving Report II found that 44% of Muslims prefer to give to Muslim-led charities, and 4 in 10 have donated to a religious cause in the past year. Similarly, for Christian communities, charitable donations often rise during festive seasons such as Christmas.

Beyond the Individual: The Charitable Triad

Charitable donations are not just about who the donor is — it’s also shaped by who’s asking and who’s receiving. 

According to Charitable Triad Theory, donation decisions are influenced by the dynamic interaction between three key actors: the donor, the beneficiary, and the fundraiser or organisation making the ask. 

A donor might feel more compelled to give based on their values, but also on the perceived need or relatability of the beneficiary, or the trust and credibility of the fundraiser. These relationships can exist in dyads (e.g., donor–beneficiary or donor–fundraiser) or a fully triadic interplay.

This theory reminds us that successful fundraising isn’t just about targeting the right demographic—it’s about fostering authentic, trust-based connections between all parties involved.

It underscores the importance of a charity’s ability to project trustworthiness, authenticity, and clarity. The Charity Commission’s Trust in Charities report highlights transparency as a top driver of public trust, particularly concerning the financial aspect of charities.

Turning Insight into Impact: What Can Charities Do Next?

Understanding why people give allows charities a clear edge. But insight alone isn’t enough. To move from understanding to action, charities need to meet donors where they are, speak to what matters most, and remove every barrier that gets in the way of generosity.

Here’s how:

• Personalised Giving Journeys with CRM: With the right tools, charities can segment, personalise, and automate communications. CRMs like Engage allow you to send timely nudges and create consistent journeys.
• Make giving simple: Remove friction in forms, optimise for mobile, and ensure donation journeys are as intuitive as possible.
• Using Analytics to Predict Donor Behaviour: With data insights, you can predict who is likely to give again, upgrade, or lapse. This lets you tailor messages and avoid donor fatigue.

The more attuned you are to why people give, the better equipped you’ll be to turn fleeting interest into long-term loyalty. When you combine insight with thoughtful action, you create the conditions for generosity to grow — not just once, but again and again.

📥 Free Resource: Put Psychology into Action

Want to apply the insights from this article? Get our free checklist with actionable steps charities and fundraisers can implement to put donor psychology into practice and drive real results.

‍